All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MDS Alliance.

The MDS Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your MDS Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The MDS Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MDS Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MDS Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
As of January 1st, 2024, the MDS Hub will no longer be updated. Please continue to browse our archive for valuable content. For the latest updates in MDS, visit our sister site aml-hub.com.
2020-06-29T20:27:56.000Z

Magrolimab plus azacytidine in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia

Featured
Jun 29, 2020
Share:

Bookmark this article

During the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Virtual Meeting 2020, David Sallman from the Moffitt Cancer Center, US, presented an abstract on 5F9005, a phase Ib study (NCT03248479), investigating the safety and efficacy of magrolimab plus azacytidine (AZA) in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML).1 He presented data from the expansion cohort.

Magrolimab (Hu5F9-G4), which was last year granted fast track designation by the U.S Food and Drug Administration, is a first-in-class antibody against CD47, a macrophage immune checkpoint protein. This antibody has been shown to block phagocytic evasion, inducing tumor phagocytosis, which facilitates the elimination of malignant cells. In preclinical models, a synergy of magrolimab with AZA has been observed. The 5F9005 study was designed to examine whether such synergy can be seen in patients, and to assess the tolerability and clinical activity of the combination.

Study design and patient characteristics

Patients with untreated AML who were ineligible for induction therapy or with untreated intermediate/very high-risk MDS were eligible for the study. The study was designed as a dose escalation (N = 6) followed by cohort expansion. Magrolimab was administered in an escalating dose from (1–30 mg/kg) for the first 2 weeks. Then at a maintenance dose of 30 mg/kg weekly (Q1W) throughout, or once every 2 weeks (Q2W) from Cycle 3+. AZA (75 mg/m2) was given on Day 1–7 of each cycle.

The primary objectives of the study were safety and efficacy assessed by the International Working Group 2006 (MDS), and the European Leukemia Net 2017 (AML) criteria. Secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity, while exploratory objectives aimed to assess CD47 receptor occupancy, markers of immune cell activity, and molecular profiling in AML/MDS.

Based on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and a similar receptor occupancy with Q1W and Q2W, Q2W dosing was selected.

Baseline patient and disease characteristics are presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Selected baseline patient and disease characteristics in untreated MDS and AML

AML, acute myeloid leukemia; MDS, myelodysplastic syndromes; MRC, myelodysplasia-related changes; NA, not applicable; RS, ringed sideroblasts; WHO, World Health Organization.

Characteristic

MDS (N = 39)

AML (N = 29)

 

Median age (range), years

70 (47–80)

74 (60–89)

 

Cytogenetics risk, %

Intermediate

Poor

Unknown

 

28

64

8

 

7

72

21

 

WHO AML classification, %

MRC

Recurrent genetic abnormalities

Therapy related

Not otherwise specified

NA

 

66

7

10

17

 

WHO MDS classification, %

RS and single/multi-lineage dysplasia

Multi-lineage dysplasia

RS with multi-lineage dysplasia

Excess blasts

Unclassifiable/unknown

 

3

18

8

56

15

NA

 

Therapy related MDS, %

31

NA

 

Harboring TP53 mutation

13

45

 

Results for the expansion cohort

Safety

  • The maximum tolerated dose was not reached
  • The safety profile of the magrolimab plus AZA combination was consistent with AZA monotherapy
  • The most frequent adverse event (AE) was anemia, which significantly improved over time in the majority of patients
  • There were no significant cytopenias, infections, or immune-related AEs
  • Most patients had improved neutrophil and platelet counts on combined therapy
  • Discontinuation due to drug-related AEs was reported in 1/68 (1.5%) of patients from the combination treatment who experienced a severe infusion-related reaction

Efficacy

  • The median follow-up was 5.8 (2.0–15.0) and 9.4 (1.9–16.9) months for patients with MDS and AML, respectively
  • Overall, efficacy with magrolimab plus AZA was higher than with AZA monotherapy
  • The combination induced high overall response rates (ORR) in patients with MDS and AML (Table 2)
    • ORR of 91% and 64%, including 42% and 56% of patients with complete response, respectively
    • 35% and 50% of patients achieved a complete cytogenetic response
  • Responses deepened over time, with a median duration of response not reached
  • Median overall survival was not reached
  • Median time to response was 1.9 months
  • In total, 9/58 (16%) of patients proceeded to receive allogeneic stem cell transplant
  • The combination was also effective in patients with TP53 mutations (Table 3)

Table 2. Responses with magrolimab plus AZA

Best overall response

MDS (N = 33)

AML (N = 25)

ORR, %

91

64

CR, %

42

40

CRi, %

NA

16

PR, %

3

4

SD, %

9

32

PD, %

0

4

MRD negative status, %

20

50

Median DoR, months

NR

NR

Median follow-up (range), months

5.8 (2.0–15.0)

9.4 (1.9–16.9)

AML, acute myeloid leukemia; CR, complete response; CRi, CR with incomplete hematologic recovery; DoR, duration of response; MDS, myelodysplastic syndromes; MRD, measurable residual disease; NA, not applicable; NR, not reached; ORR, overall response rate; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease.

 

Table 3. Responses in patients with TP53 mutations

AML, acute myeloid leukemia; CR, complete response; CRi, CR with incomplete hematologic recovery; DoR, duration of response; MRD, measurable residual disease; MDS, myelodysplastic syndromes; NR, not reached.

Best overall response

MDS TP53 mutant
(n = 4)

AML TP53 mutant
(n = 12)

ORR, %

75

75

CR, %

50

42

CRi/marrow CR, %

25

33

Complete cytogenetic response, n (%)

3/3 (100)

4/8 (50)

MRD negative status of responders, n, (%)

0

4/9 (44)

Median DoR, months

NR

NR

6-months survival probability, %

100

91

Median follow-up (range), months

7 (4.2–12.2)

8.8 (1.9–16.9)

Conclusion

The data indicate that magrolimab, a first-in-class anti-CD47 antibody, in combination with AZA has a manageable toxicity profile and encouraging efficacy in patients with MDS and AML. Moreover, the combination demonstrated activity in patients with TP53 mutations, a high unmet need population with poor outcomes. A further study to explore the efficacy of magrolimab in the TP53 mutated AML is planned.

The cohort expansion study (NCT03248479) in patients with MDS and AML is ongoing, as are the registrational studies for MDS.

Expert Opinion

  1. Sallman DA, Al Malki M, Asch AS, et al. Tolerability and efficacy of the first-in-class anti-CD47 antibody magrolimab combined with azacitidine in MDS and AML patients: Phase Ib results. Oral abstract #7507. ASCO Annual Meeting 2020; May 29–31, 2020. Virtual.

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to MDS delivered to your inbox