TRANSLATE

The mds Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mds Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mds and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Luspatercept granted FDA approval as a first-line treatment for anemia in patients with lower-risk MDS

By Dylan Barrett

Share:

Aug 29, 2023

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new development in lower-risk MDS.


On August 28, luspatercept-aamt, a first-in-class erythroid-maturation agent, was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of anemia in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA)-naïve, adult patients with very low- to intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) who may require red blood cell (RBC) transfusions.1

Luspatercept-aamt was granted priority review by the FDA for the same indication, and was previously approved by the FDA and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the treatment of anemia in patients with MDS with ring sideroblasts who are transfusion-dependent and do not respond to or are ineligible for ESA treatment.

This approval is based on interim results from the open-label, randomized, phase III COMMANDS trial (NCT03682536), covered here on the MDS Hub, that found luspatercept-aamt to be associated with improved RBC transfusion independence and increased hemoglobin when compared with epoetin alfa, independent of ring sideroblast status, in patients with lower-risk MDS who are RBC transfusion-dependent and ESA-naïve.1

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content