The mds Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mds Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mds and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View mds content recommended for you
On May 1, 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) accepted a supplemental biologics license application and granted priority review to luspatercept-aamt, a first-in-class erythroid-maturation agent, for the treatment of anemia in adult patients with very low- to intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) who have not previously been treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs).1 The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has also validated the type II variation application for luspatercept-aamt for the same indication.1
Luspatercept-aamt has previously been approved by both the FDA and EMA for the treatment of anemia in patients with MDS with ring sideroblasts (MDS-RS) who are transfusion dependent and either do not respond to or are ineligible for ESA treatment. These approvals were based on results from the phase III MEDALIST trial (NCT02631070), previously covered on the MDS Hub. The latest submissions are based on results from the phase III, open-label, randomized COMMANDS trial (NCT03682536), investigating the efficacy and safety of luspatercept-aamt versus epoetin alfa, an ESA, for the treatment of patients with anemia with very low- to intermediate-risk MDS who require red blood cell (RBC) transfusions and have not previously received ESA treatment.1 Results indicate that first-line treatment of this patient population with luspatercept-aamt improves RBC transfusion independence for ≥12 weeks, with a concurrent hemoglobin increase of ≥1.5 g/dL, compared with epoetin alfa.1 The safety profile of luspatercept-aamt was consistent with previous studies.1
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content