Lenalidomide reduces risk of transfusion dependency in lower-risk MDS: Interim results of the Sintra-REV trial

The therapeutic goal for patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is to improve bone marrow function and reduce the requirement for red blood cell transfusions. Lenalidomide has been shown to offer clinical benefit for lower-risk patients with 5q deletion [del(5q)] but is currently only approved for patients with transfusion dependency due to toxicity concerns. It is proposed that early treatment with lenalidomide at a low dose may prolong the time to transfusion dependency, and ultimately improve outcomes.¹

The interim results of the phase III Sintra-REV study (NCT01243476; data cut-off, July 2020), investigating the efficacy and safety of early treatment with low-dose lenalidomide in patients with lower-risk MDS and del(5q), were presented by Maria Diez-Campelo during the 62nd American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition.¹ Here we summarize the findings.

Trial design

A phase III, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study, with the following patient inclusion criteria:

• MDS diagnosis (World Health Organization 2008)
• International prognostic scoring system (IPSS) low or intermediate-1
• No red blood cell transfusion requirements
• Anemia (hemoglobin <12 g/dL)
• Del(5q) (+/- other abnormality)

A summary of the study design is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Sintra-REV trial design¹

R, randomization.

Primary endpoint:

• Efficacy determined by time to disease progression and transfusion dependency

Secondary objectives included:

• Erythroid and cytogenetic response
• Safety and tolerability
• Overall survival, event-free survival, and transformation to acute myeloid leukemia

Patient characteristics and disposition

Selected patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. There were no significant differences observed between the lenalidomide and placebo arms.

Table 1. Selected patient characteristics¹

At the time of reporting, >80% of patients had completed the trial protocol. The median time on treatment was higher in the lenalidomide arm compared with the placebo arm (23.9 vs 10.6 months). Lenalidomide treatment was discontinued in 52.5% of patients, mainly due to progressive disease and need for transfusion (38%), rejection of informed consent (28.5%), or physician decision (23.8%). In the placebo arm, treatment was discontinued in 66.6% of patients; progressive disease and transfusion need accounted for 71.4% of these cases.

Efficacy

• Transfusion dependency was observed in 27.5% of patients treated with lenalidomide, compared with 57.1% of patients treated with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.338; p = 0.028).
• Time to transfusion dependency was delayed in the lenalidomide arm compared with the placebo arm (median transfusion-free survival, 6.3 years vs 2.8 years; p = 0.023).
• Lenalidomide treatment resulted in erythroid response in 72.5% of patients, and cytogenetic response in 80% of patients; of these, 87.5% achieved a complete cytogenetic response.
• Patients in the placebo arm did not achieve either erythroid or cytogenetic responses.
• Median overall survival was not reached in either treatment arm.

Safety

Low-dose lenalidomide was considered safe and well-tolerated. Grade 3–4 adverse events are summarized in Table 2. Although almost half of patients in the lenalidomide arm developed neutropenia, only one developed febrile neutropenia and there were no neutropenia-related complications requiring hospitalization.

There were nine deaths in total, none related to study treatment, and acute myeloid leukemia was diagnosed in three patients, of which two (5%) were in the lenalidomide arm and one (5%) in the placebo arm.

Table 2. Grade 3–4 adverse events¹

Conclusions

In this interim analysis of the phase III Sintra-REV trial, early treatment with low-dose lenalidomide delayed the time to and reduced the risk of transfusion dependency for patients with lower-risk, del(5q) MDS. Erythroid and cytogenetic responses were observed in 72.5% and 80% of patients, respectively, and the low-dose treatment had an acceptable safety profile. Since the follow-up data is not yet mature, the impact of this regimen on long-term outcome is still to be determined.