All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MDS Alliance.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your MDS Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe MDS Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MDS Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MDS Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
Bookmark this article
During the 64th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition, the MDS Hub was pleased to speak to Theo de Witte, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, NL. We asked, Is there confusion between the World Health Organisation (WHO) and Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-M) classifications of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)?
Is there confusion between WHO and IPSS-M classifications of MDS?
De Witte begins by discussing the basis of the current IPSS-M criteria on cytogenetics characteristics, blast percentage, and severity of cytopenia, despite half of patients diagnosed with MDS having normal karyotypes. Moving on, De Witte compares the IPSS-M with the recently updated WHO classification and its focus on diagnosis and morphological features. De Witte emphasizes the importance of identifying specific genetic mutations to determine prognosis more accurately, omitted from the WHO classification.
Subscribe to get the best content related to MDS delivered to your inbox