All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MDS Alliance.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your MDS Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe MDS Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MDS Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MDS Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
Bookmark this article
While allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is potentially curative for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), most patients with MDS are older and have comorbidities, rendering them ineligible for standard myeloablative conditioning (MAC) due to high nonrelapse mortality (NRM). Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens have allowed for transplantation in older patients, although evidence demonstrating their association with reduced NRM comes from retrospective studies that employed purposive sampling, and evidence supporting the use of one regimen over another is inconclusive.
Treosulfan is a bifunctional alkylating agent with durable myeloablative and immunosuppressive characteristics allowing consistent hematopoietic cell engraftment with a lower risk of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), making it a suitable component of the conditioning regimen given, prior to allo-HCT. The combination of fludarabine and treosulfan (FT) has demonstrated lower risk of GvHD and NRM in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Shimoni et al.1 retrospectively compared outcomes following FT versus other RIC and MAC regimens in patients with MDS, which was recently published in the British Journal of Haematology and summarized herein.
This was a retrospective cohort study using patient data from the Chronic Malignancies Working Party (CMWP) database of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). Eligibility criteria for patients included de novo or secondary MDS and had undergone an allo-HCT from a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling or an unrelated donor between 2000‒2016. Patients were divided into three groups (FT, RIC, and MAC) based on dose intensity as reported by the participating center.
The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), defined as the day of allo-HCT until death of any cause or last follow-up. Secondary outcomes included:
A total of 1,722 patients with MDS, either from HLA-matched siblings (n = 747) or unrelated donors (n = 975), were included. The median age was 56 years (range, 18‒76) and 60% of the patients were male (Table 1).
Table 1. Baseline characteristics*
Characteristic, % (unless otherwise stated) |
Total |
FT |
RIC |
MAC |
p value† |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Median age, years (range) |
56 |
59 |
59 |
51 |
<0.001 |
Disease classification at diagnosis |
|||||
RA |
35 |
39 |
35 |
34 |
0.46 |
RAEB1 |
22 |
21 |
23 |
21 |
|
RAEB2 |
30 |
25 |
30 |
33 |
|
Missing |
13 |
14 |
13 |
12 |
|
AML transformation before allo-HCT |
23 |
20 |
22 |
25 |
0.11 |
Status at allo-HCT |
|||||
Untreated |
34 |
45 |
26 |
36 |
<0.001 |
CR/PR |
29 |
26 |
36 |
25 |
|
Refractory |
36 |
29 |
39 |
39 |
|
Cytogenetics |
|||||
Good |
17 |
16 |
18 |
15 |
0.49 |
Intermediate |
14 |
13 |
15 |
15 |
|
Poor |
14 |
14 |
14 |
12 |
|
Secondary‡ |
21 |
23 |
20 |
20 |
0.38 |
Time from diagnosis to allo-HCT, months (range) |
9.7 |
9.4 |
10.6 |
9.0 |
0.007 |
Donor |
|||||
Sibling |
43 |
41 |
39 |
49 |
0.001 |
Unrelated |
57 |
59 |
61 |
51 |
|
SC source |
|||||
PB |
88 |
91 |
94 |
78 |
<0.001 |
BM |
12 |
9 |
6 |
22 |
|
In vivo T-cell depletion |
65 |
65 |
79 |
50 |
<0.001 |
F → M |
20 |
21 |
25 |
18 |
0.51 |
CMV neg/neg‡ |
25 |
22 |
29 |
23 |
0.02 |
Median follow-up, months (range) |
64 |
75 |
60 |
64 |
<0.001 |
Median year of allo-HCT, range |
2009 |
2009 |
2010 |
2009 |
<0.001 |
allo-HCT, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; BM, bone marrow; CMV neg/neg, donor and recipient are CMV negative; CR, complete response; F → M, female donor to male recipient; FT, fludarabine and treosulfan; MAC, myeloablative conditioning; PB, peripheral blood; PR, partial response; RA, refractory anemia; RAEB, refractory anemia with excess blasts; RIC, reduced-intensity conditioning; SC, stem cell. |
Table 2. Univariate analysis of factors predicting the 5-year survival and NRM after allo-HCT*
Factor |
Alive |
OS |
p value† |
NRM |
NRM |
p value† |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All patients |
850 |
44 |
— |
485 |
30 |
— |
Conditioning regimen |
||||||
FT |
194 |
50 |
0.03 |
104 |
30 |
0.008 |
RIC |
331 |
43 |
170 |
27 |
||
MAC |
325 |
43 |
211 |
34 |
||
Age |
||||||
≥55 years |
421 |
39 |
<0.001 |
292 |
33 |
0.03 |
<55 years |
429 |
51 |
193 |
27 |
||
Gender |
||||||
Male |
499 |
44 |
0.22 |
312 |
32 |
0.03 |
Female |
351 |
45 |
173 |
27 |
||
Disease classification at diagnosis |
||||||
RA |
338 |
51 |
0.001 |
183 |
33 |
0.09 |
RAEB1 |
155 |
36 |
114 |
33 |
||
RAEB2 |
246 |
43 |
126 |
26 |
||
Missing |
111 |
44 |
62 |
32 |
||
AML transformation before allo-HCT |
||||||
Yes |
158 |
35 |
<0.001 |
108 |
29 |
0.04 |
No |
692 |
47 |
377 |
31 |
||
Status at allo-HCT |
||||||
Untreated |
310 |
48 |
0.006 |
183 |
34 |
0.05 |
CR/PR |
257 |
45 |
125 |
27 |
||
Refractory |
283 |
40 |
177 |
30 |
||
Cytogenetics |
||||||
Good |
147 |
51 |
<0.001 |
87 |
31 |
0.36 |
Intermediate |
117 |
45 |
65 |
27 |
||
Poor |
84 |
33 |
60 |
26 |
||
Missing |
502 |
45 |
273 |
32 |
||
Secondary |
||||||
Yes |
137 |
36 |
0.04 |
88 |
30 |
0.81 |
No |
614 |
46 |
351 |
31 |
||
Time from diagnosis to early allo-HCT |
||||||
Early |
428 |
44 |
0.95 |
226 |
28 |
0.07 |
Donor |
||||||
Sibling |
382 |
45 |
0.26 |
186 |
27 |
0.01 |
Unrelated |
468 |
44 |
299 |
33 |
||
CMV neg/neg |
||||||
Yes |
215 |
49 |
0.07 |
115 |
30 |
0.82 |
No |
585 |
43 |
342 |
30 |
||
Year of allo-HCT |
||||||
≤2009 |
404 |
41 |
0.006 |
268 |
32 |
0.14 |
>2009 |
446 |
48 |
217 |
29 |
||
AML, acute myeloid leukemia; allo-HCT, allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation; CMV, cytomegalovirus; CR, complete response; FT, fludarabine and treosulfan; MAC, myeloablative conditioning; NRM, nonrelapse mortality; OS, overall survival; PR, partial response; RA, refractory anemia; RAEB, refractory anemia with excess blasts; RIC, reduced-intensity conditioning. |
This large cohort study in patients with MDS demonstrated that the OS with FT was comparable to the OS seen with RIC and MAC, and FT was associated with low relapse rates, like MAC, and low NRM rates, like RIC. The current study had certain limitations in that it was a retrospective study with limited data and no data on comorbidities in the patients. Treosulfan was approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in June 2019 as a conditioning treatment prior to hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation, and FT may become the preferred regimen for allo-HCT in patients with MDS.
Subscribe to get the best content related to MDS delivered to your inbox