All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MDS Alliance.

The MDS Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your MDS Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The MDS Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MDS Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MDS Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
As of January 1st, 2024, the MDS Hub will no longer be updated. Please continue to browse our archive for valuable content. For the latest updates in MDS, visit our sister site aml-hub.com.
2021-11-03T15:59:31.000Z

Fludarabine/treosulfan for allo-HCT in patients with MDS

Nov 3, 2021
Share:

Bookmark this article

While allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is potentially curative for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), most patients with MDS are older and have comorbidities, rendering them ineligible for standard myeloablative conditioning (MAC) due to high nonrelapse mortality (NRM). Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens have allowed for transplantation in older patients, although evidence demonstrating their association with reduced NRM comes from retrospective studies that employed purposive sampling, and evidence supporting the use of one regimen over another is inconclusive.

Treosulfan is a bifunctional alkylating agent with durable myeloablative and immunosuppressive characteristics allowing consistent hematopoietic cell engraftment with a lower risk of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), making it a suitable component of the conditioning regimen given, prior to allo-HCT. The combination of fludarabine and treosulfan (FT) has demonstrated lower risk of GvHD and NRM in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Shimoni et al.1 retrospectively compared outcomes following FT versus other RIC and MAC regimens in patients with MDS, which was recently published in the British Journal of Haematology and summarized herein.

Study design

This was a retrospective cohort study using patient data from the Chronic Malignancies Working Party (CMWP) database of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). Eligibility criteria for patients included de novo or secondary MDS and had undergone an allo-HCT from a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling or an unrelated donor between 2000‒2016. Patients were divided into three groups (FT, RIC, and MAC) based on dose intensity as reported by the participating center.

The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), defined as the day of allo-HCT until death of any cause or last follow-up. Secondary outcomes included:

  • NRM: Death without prior disease recurrence
  • Relapse mortality
  • Acute GvHD (aGvHD) and chronic GvHD (cGvHD)

Results

Baseline characteristics

A total of 1,722 patients with MDS, either from HLA-matched siblings (n = 747) or unrelated donors (n = 975), were included. The median age was 56 years (range, 18‒76) and 60% of the patients were male (Table 1).

  • Patients in the FT and RIC group were older compared with those in the MAC group (p < 0.001), but other disease characteristics were well balanced between the three groups (Table 1).
  • The most common regimens included high-dose busulfan/cyclophosphamide (37%) and fludarabine/high-dose busulfan (32%) for MAC and fludarabine with reduced-dose busulfan (82%) for RIC. FT regimens included total doses of 30 g/m2 (10%), 36 g/m2 (17%), 42 g/m2 (44%) or other/missing (29%).

Table 1. Baseline characteristics*

Characteristic, % (unless otherwise stated)

Total
(n = 1,722)

FT
(n = 367)

RIC
(n = 687)

MAC
(n = 668)

p value

Median age, years (range)

56
(18–76)

59
(18–76)

59
(19–75)

51
(18–74)

<0.001

Disease classification at diagnosis

              RA

35

39

35

34

0.46

              RAEB1

22

21

23

21

              RAEB2

30

25

30

33

              Missing

13

14

13

12

AML transformation before allo-HCT

23

20

22

25

0.11

Status at allo-HCT

              Untreated

34

45

26

36

<0.001

              CR/PR

29

26

36

25

              Refractory

36

29

39

39

Cytogenetics

              Good

17

16

18

15

0.49

              Intermediate

14

13

15

15

              Poor

14

14

14

12

Secondary

21

23

20

20

0.38

Time from diagnosis to allo-HCT, months (range)

9.7
(0.1–370)

9.4
(0.3–214)

10.6
(0.2–207)

9.0
(0.1–370)

0.007

Donor

              Sibling

43

41

39

49

0.001

              Unrelated

57

59

61

51

SC source

              PB

88

91

94

78

<0.001

              BM

12

9

6

22

In vivo T-cell depletion

65

65

79

50

<0.001

F → M

20

21

25

18

0.51

CMV neg/neg

25

22

29

23

0.02

Median follow-up, months (range)

64
(1–171)

75
(1–169)

60
(2–171)

64
(1–137)

<0.001

Median year of allo-HCT, range

2009
(2000–2016)

2009
(2002–2016)

2010
(2002–2016)

2009
(2000–2016)

<0.001

allo-HCT, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; BM, bone marrow; CMV neg/neg, donor and recipient are CMV negative; CR, complete response; F → M, female donor to male recipient; FT, fludarabine and treosulfan; MAC, myeloablative conditioning; PB, peripheral blood; PR, partial response; RA, refractory anemia; RAEB, refractory anemia with excess blasts; RIC, reduced-intensity conditioning; SC, stem cell.
*Adapted from Shimoni et al.1
Values in bold are statistically significant.
Calculated from known data, data missing (<10%).

OS and NRM

  • The median follow-up amongst surviving patients (n = 850) was 64 months and 75, 60, and 64 months after FT, RIC, and MAC, respectively (p < 0.001).
  • The 5-year OS rate across all groups was 44%, and 50%, 43%, and 43% after FT, RIC, and MAC, respectively (p = 0.03). Factors predicting OS using univariate analysis are presented in Table 2.
  • The major causes of death included disease recurrence (n = 384), GvHD (n = 165), infection (n = 161), organ toxicities (n = 73), and second malignancies (n = 16).
  • Improved OS rates were consistent in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; p = 0.01) for FT.
    • However, lower survival rates were predicted for advanced age (HR, 1.41; p < 0.001), transformation to AML before allo-HCT (HR, 1.43; p < 0.001), secondary MDS (HR, 1.19; p = 0.05), poor cytogenetics (HR, 1.34; p = 0.004), and earlier years of allo-HCT (≤2009, HR, 1.28; p = 0.001).
    • No significant differences were observed in the 5-year OS after conditioning with different dose intensity of FT (p = 0.68).
    • OS improved in all three groups and the improvement associated with FT was mostly observed in patients ≥55 years of age (p = 0.001) compared with younger patients (p = 0.52).
    • OS with FT was also more prominent with active disease at allo-HCT and in patients with poor cytogenetics.
  • The 5-year NRM rate was 30% across all groups, and 30%, 27%, and 34% after FT, RIC, and MAC, respectively (p = 0.008) (Table 2).
    • Higher NRM was predicted by MAC (HR, 1.44; p = 0.001), advanced age (HR, 1.51; p < 0.001), allo-HCT from an unrelated donor (HR, 1.21; p = 0.06) and earlier years of allo-HCT (≤2009, HR, 1.21; p = 0.05) in the multivariate analysis.

Table 2. Univariate analysis of factors predicting the 5-year survival and NRM after allo-HCT*

Factor

Alive
(n)

OS
Cumulative incidence

p value

NRM
(n)

NRM
Cumulative incidence

p value

All patients

850

44

485

30

Conditioning regimen

              FT

194

50

0.03

104

30

0.008

              RIC

331

43

170

27

              MAC

325

43

211

34

Age

              ≥55 years

421

39

<0.001

292

33

0.03

              <55 years

429

51

193

27

Gender

              Male

499

44

0.22

312

32

0.03

              Female

351

45

173

27

Disease classification at diagnosis

              RA

338

51

0.001

183

33

0.09

              RAEB1

155

36

114

33

              RAEB2

246

43

126

26

              Missing

111

44

62

32

AML transformation before allo-HCT

              Yes

158

35

<0.001

108

29

0.04

              No

692

47

377

31

Status at allo-HCT

              Untreated

310

48

0.006

183

34

0.05

              CR/PR

257

45

125

27

              Refractory

283

40

177

30

Cytogenetics

              Good

147

51

<0.001

87

31

0.36

              Intermediate

117

45

65

27

              Poor

84

33

60

26

              Missing

502

45

273

32

Secondary

              Yes

137

36

0.04

88

30

0.81

              No

614

46

351

31

Time from diagnosis to early allo-HCT

              Early

428

44

0.95

226

28

0.07

Donor

              Sibling

382

45

0.26

186

27

0.01

              Unrelated

468

44

299

33

CMV neg/neg

              Yes

215

49

0.07

115

30

0.82

              No

585

43

342

30

Year of allo-HCT

              ≤2009

404

41

0.006

268

32

0.14

              >2009

446

48

217

29

AML, acute myeloid leukemia; allo-HCT, allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation; CMV, cytomegalovirus; CR, complete response; FT, fludarabine and treosulfan; MAC, myeloablative conditioning; NRM, nonrelapse mortality; OS, overall survival; PR, partial response; RA, refractory anemia; RAEB, refractory anemia with excess blasts; RIC, reduced-intensity conditioning.
*Adapted from Shimoni et al.1
Values in bold are statistically significant.

Relapse mortality

  • FT, RIC, and MAC showed relapse rates of 25%, 38%, and 25%, respectively (p < 0.001).
  • FT (HR, 0.55; p <0.001) and MAC (HR, 0.61; p < 0.001) predicted a lower relapse rate compared with RIC in the multivariate analysis.
    • Higher relapse rate was predicted by advanced age (HR, 1.22; p = 0.06), transformation to AML before allo-HCT (HR, 1.93; p < 0.001), poor cytogenetics (HR, 1.87; p < 0.001), treatment-refractory disease (HR, 1.59; p < 0.001) and earlier years of allo-HCT (≤2009, HR, 1.42; p = 0.001).

GvHD

  • A total of 455 patients developed Grade 2–4 aGvHD with a cumulative incidence of 30% at 1 year and 633 patients developed cGvHD with a cumulative incidence of 43% at 2 years after allo-HCT.
    • The cumulative incidences for aGvHD were 26%, 24%, and 34% after FT, RIC, and MAC, respectively (p = 0.001), and 46%, 41%, and 43% after FT, RIC, and MAC, respectively (p = 0.56) for cGvHD.
    • 350 patients of the 633 developed extensive cGvHD with cumulative incidences of 31%, 25%, and 30% after FT, RIC, and MAC, respectively (p = 0.18).
  • Deaths related to GvHD occurred in 9%, 10%, and 18% of patients in the FT, RIC, and MAC groups, respectively (p = 0.007).

Conclusion

This large cohort study in patients with MDS demonstrated that the OS with FT was comparable to the OS seen with RIC and MAC, and FT was associated with low relapse rates, like MAC, and low NRM rates, like RIC. The current study had certain limitations in that it was a retrospective study with limited data and no data on comorbidities in the patients. Treosulfan was approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in June 2019 as a conditioning treatment prior to hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation, and FT may become the preferred regimen for allo-HCT in patients with MDS.

  1. Shimoni A, Robin M, Lacobelli S, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome using treosulfan based compared to other reduced-intensity or myeloablative conditioning regimens. A report of the chronic malignancies working party of the EBMT. Br J Haematol. 2021;195(3):417-428. DOI: 1111/bjh.17817

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to MDS delivered to your inbox