The mds Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mds Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mds and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View mds content recommended for you
On August 1, 2022, aspacytarabine, an investigational novel antimetabolite, was granted orphan drug designation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).1
Aspacytarabine (BST-236) is a novel proprietary antimetabolite. It is made up of cytarabine covalently bound to asparagine. Aspacytarabine enables high-dose therapy with lower systemic exposure to free cytarabine and relative sparing of normal tissues, making it a suitable therapy for older adults who are unfit for intensive therapy. The FDA previously granted aspacytarabine orphan drug designation for the treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in 2019.1
The safety and efficacy of aspacytarabine as a single-agent first-line therapy for patients with AML have previously been demonstrated, and additional studies are ongoing to assess aspacytarabine as a second-line treatment for patients with relapsed/refractory MDS. The AML Hub has previously published an article and an expert opinion on aspacytarabine.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content