The mds Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mds Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mds and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View mds content recommended for you
The presence of TP53 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes with excess blasts (MDS-EB) has been identified as a prognostic factor for poor survival outcomes and complex karyotypes. Despite this, a comparison of the molecular characteristics and treatment responses in patients with TP53-mutated AML and MDS-EB has not yet been performed. If mutant TP53 AML and MDS-EB were found to be similar with respect to molecular characteristics and survival, such findings could suggest a new classification of these disease subtypes as a single molecular disease entity.
An in-depth clinical and molecular analysis of TP53-mutated AML/MDS-EB was recently published by Grob et al.1 in Blood. We summarize key results below.
A total of 2,200 patients with newly diagnosed AML/MDS-EB who received standard induction chemotherapy were analyzed via next-generation sequencing (NGS).
The study design is summarized in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Study design*
AML, acute myeloid leukemia; MDS-EB, myelodysplastic syndromes with excess blasts; MRD, minimal residual disease.
*Adapted from Grob et al.1
Patient characteristics for the AML and MDS-EB cohorts are summarized in Table 1. No significant differences in patient characteristics were observed apart from a greater presence of deletion 5q in patients with MDS-EB (p = 0.025).
Table 1. Patient characteristics for AML and MDS-EB cohorts*
AML, acute myeloid leukemia; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; MDS-EB, myelodysplastic syndromes with excess blasts. |
||
Characteristic |
AML |
MDS-EB |
---|---|---|
Median age, years (range) |
62 (18–80) |
63 (35–73) |
Female, % |
40 |
43 |
White blood cell count ≤100, % |
99 |
100 |
Allogeneic HSCT, % |
74 |
75 |
Cytogenetics, % |
||
Monosomy 5 |
28 |
27 |
Deletion 5q |
44 |
63 |
Monosomy 7 |
32 |
34 |
Monosomy 17 |
40 |
24 |
Abnormality 17p |
18 |
15 |
Complex karyotype |
83 |
90 |
Monosomal karyotype |
78 |
85 |
A molecular analysis of mutant allele status, number of TP53 mutations, TP53 variant allele frequency (VAF), and concurrent mutations are summarized in Table 2. No significant difference was reported in any of the molecular characteristics between TP53-mutated AML and MDS-EB. The most prevalent concurrent mutations reported in the entire AML/MDS-EB cohort included DNMT3A (13%), TET2 (9%), ASXL1 (5%), RUNX1 (5%), and SRSF2 (6%).
Most patients with AML/MDS-EB had complex karyotype (84%)
Table 2. Molecular characterization of TP53-mutated AML/MDS-EB*
AML, acute myeloid leukemia; MDS, myelodysplastic syndromes; MDS-EB, myelodysplastic syndromes with excess blasts; VAF, variant allele frequency. |
|||
Characteristic |
AML |
MDS |
AML/MDS-EB |
---|---|---|---|
TP53-mutant bi-allelic status, % |
77 |
68 |
76 |
Multiple TP53 mutations, % |
19 |
30 |
21 |
TP53 VAF, median (range) |
48 (1–97) |
41 (3–91) |
47 (1–97) |
Concurrent mutation, % |
51 |
41 |
49 |
Overall, detailed molecular analysis of TP53-mutated AML/MDS-EB revealed homogeneity of molecular characteristics and clinical outcomes between these disease types. As such, the authors indicated a new classification of TP53-mutated AML/MDS-EB as a single disease entity.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content